Managers lose hours asking for the same missing records.
For 10-50 person UK accounting firms
Recover billable capacity before hiring again.
We identify where client chasing, document intake, Companies House checks and routine handoffs are draining fee-earner time, then build supervised workflows that return capacity without removing professional control.
Email, portals, folders, and attachments create quiet duplication.
Companies House, tax deadlines, and internal updates are manually pulled.
Partners see exceptions and approvals, not every low-value admin decision.
Partners do not need AI theatre. They need clear controls, named ownership, and a visible audit trail before client work moves through automation.
See where your firm is losing fee-earner capacity.
The leak map shows which recurring workflows are consuming manager and partner time, how much capacity they represent, and which ones can be routed, drafted, checked, or escalated through a controlled workflow.
Managers write repeated reminders, update trackers by hand, and interrupt client work to find missing records.
- Typical drag
- 8-14h per week
- First automation
- Reminder engine with escalation queue
- Control retained
- Approval rules and full message log
Put a value on the admin your team already feels.
Adjust the assumptions to estimate how much non-billable drag could be recovered before you add headcount, reduce write-offs, or ask senior staff to absorb more work.
About 91 fee-earner days returned each year.
Automate admin while your accountants stay in control.
Client records, emails, portals, Companies House data
Sources are gathered into one operating queue instead of scattered inbox work.
Classify, chase, draft, route, and flag exceptions
Routine work is handled automatically; ambiguity is made visible.
Accountant review before sensitive client action
Advice, judgement, and high-risk communication stay inside firm control.
Status, owner, source, timestamp, and action history
The firm gets operational proof instead of a black-box automation.
Start with a quantified leak register.
Your firm receives a ranked view of the workflows costing the most time, a conservative capacity recovery estimate, and a practical control plan for the first automation sprint.
Five to eight admin workflows scored by time lost, recurrence, risk, and ease of automation.
Conservative value estimate using fee-earner rates, weekly drag, and practical recovery target.
One workflow selected for implementation with approval gates, exception handling, and reporting.
Turn document collection into a controlled queue.
Managers write reminders, check folders, update trackers, and chase missing records manually.
Requests, reminders, received documents, exceptions, and status updates move through one supervised queue.
Fee-earners see the exception list, not the entire admin burden behind collecting the file.
Make the hidden cost visible before asking your team to do more.
Client document chasing was absorbing manager capacity every week.
The firm believed the problem was "busy season pressure". The audit showed repeated client chasing, folder checks, and tracker updates were creating a recurring capacity leak that looked small file-by-file, but expensive across the client base.
Manual reminders, repeated inbox checks, unclear ownership.
AI drafts and routes work; accountant approves before release.
Managers see exceptions instead of carrying the full admin loop.
Show us the workflow slowing your firm down.
Tell us where your team is losing time. We will prepare a focused briefing showing the likely leakage, control requirements, and safest first workflow to automate.